National Club Championship 2015

I’ll be posting the results of the event here in due course, but for the moment I recommend the report at the Limerick CC website. There’s also some round-by-round coverage at the Ennis CC website.

However, my main purpose of this post is to address the future direction of the National Club Championship.

The build-up to the 2015 NCC was, to put it mildly, shambolic. Amidst suggestions emanating from the ICU Executive that all sorts of rules were being broken, the 2015 event was initially going to be downgraded to a mere FIDE-rated team event, then postponed and finally re-instated.

Perhaps we should not be that surprised that the organisation of this year’s NCC has gone a bit awry. From virtually its very beginnning, the Championship has been plagued with poor organisation and a failure far too often by the Irish Chess Union to take a firm grip on the event.

After this year’s difficulties the ICU Executive is promising a review of the Rules to ensure that the problems that befell the 2015 NCC never arise in the future. However, merely tinkering with the Rules is not going to solve the underlying issues. A radical rethink is needed.

The NCC was instituted in the 1950s as a knock-out competition, starting off in the provinces before reaching a national stage. This was later whittled down to four qualifiers from the provincial leagues and in the mid-1970s the NCC became an all-play-all weekender. Not infrequently some of the provinces would not send a qualifer, weakening the rationale of the competition. When the Ulster Chess Union departed from the ICU in 2005, this exascerbated that situation and in 2009 the NCC was thrown open to any club in Ireland, subject to a rating strength proviso.

The 2009-onwards Rules initially produced an increase in clubs entering but that has now tailed off and it may well be unrealistic to expect large numbers for the NCC if it is held outside Dublin.

So we might conclude that the old rationale for the NCC has gone but the replacement format has not worked.

So here’s a suggestion for a revamp. Let’s look at turning the NCC into a proper National League, with the possibility of multiple divisions.

  • Played over 5 rounds in one weekend (Friday night to Sunday afternoon)
  • Six team all-play-all “Premier League”
  • Multiple Divisions
  • One-up, one-down promotion and relegation
  • Open only to clubs competing in a provincial League
  • Second (etc) teams allowed but not entitled to promotion to top Division

Most of the other rules would remain much as before. The player eligibility rules might need a bit of a tweak, but I wouldn’t suggest a radical overhaul. My guess is that most clubs don’t want the possibility of flying in a team of GMs and IMs and the current rules do a reasonably decent job of that. One change I might tentatively suggest is that each squad could only contain a maximum number of non-IRL registered players, eg 3 in a squad and only 2 in any single match.

The format of 6 players plus two reserves and FIDE rated, four hour sessions should remain. The sheer numbers of clubs playing league chess in Leinster means that for multiple Divisions to work and to retain continuity of entry year-on-year, the event should be held only in Dublin (ideally in a non-city centre hotel).

I would also find another spot in the calendar for the event; it’s present position just before a run of tournaments – Malahide, Ennis, Drogheda – is far from ideal and I would suggest slotting the new-NCC in the one-month plus gap between Bunratty and Cork.

So how would Year 1 of my proposal look? For the “Premier League” I would suggest qualification might be along these lines:

  • 2015 winner of NCC
  • First two in Armstrong Cup
  • Winner of Munster League
  • Winner of Connacht League
  • Winner of the new Scarry Cup

Perhaps in Year 1 it might be best to start with a Swiss format for League 2, with the possibility (if things go well) of introducing further all-play-all lower Divisions gradually. After the first edition of the new-look NCC, promotion and relegation would take-over in determining what clubs played in the various Divisions.

Addressing the organisational deficit, I would suggest the ICU set up a broadly-representative sub-committee to oversee the event – if for no other reason that to ensure compliance with those pesky Rules and dealing with any issues about qualification (eg if replacement teams need to be found).

Advertisements

3 Comments

Filed under National Club Championship

3 responses to “National Club Championship 2015

  1. Interesting suggestion, and it’s good to see a detailed proposal. Some initial comments: (1) if this had been put in place last year, then this year’s Armstrong winners wouldn’t be eligible, which would be a pity; (2) but if the current year’s winners are to be eligible, the event could’t be held in the Bunratty-Cork gap. Not easy!

    I wonder if the basic problem is that the event has conflicting goals: producing a credible National Club champion and acting as a qualifier for the European Club Championship. Many teams are not interested in sending a team to the ECC, which takes away much of the point of the event. An event held over a single weekend with very limited entry (only one team from this year’s Armstrong, for example) is’t that credible as a true national championship.

    An alternative approach would be to have a separate event as an ECC qualifier, limited to teams that express an interest in going, and with relaxed rules on importing players (since a couple of GMs may be needed in the tougher environment of an ECC). There might indeed be only two or three teams interested: well and good, that makes it easier to organise.

    For a true National Club Championship, I’m not sure what to suggest. It would have to be a format that teams would like to sign up for, so a first step would be to poll them.

  2. I agree one of the likely problem areas is devising a fair qualification process in Year 1, so on reflection, maybe it would be better to have a Swiss format for that year only, with final placings determining the Division qualified for in Year 2 – and then go to promotion and relegation.

    There is indeed a tension between having a National Club Championship simply on its own terms and as a qualifier for Europe. Of course these could be separated into two events, ideally with quite different formats, but I’m not sure there would be the appetite or the calendar space for both.

    Anyway, there needs to be a debate. I don’t see the status quo as providing a true national championship.

  3. Here’s one more suggestion: provinical winners play a two-round 6-board (or 8-board?) match to decide the title. Delete item 17c in the current NCC rules (the “live in area of club” qualification). If Ulster teams aren’t interested (and leaving aside Galway for the moment) it would be a straight double-round match between the Armstrong and Miunster champions, with both qualifying for the ECC regardless of the result. Add semi-finals as appropriate if Galway and/or the Silver King winners are interested.

    Advantages: more credibility for the winning team as representing the strongest in the country over the season than the current system; easier to organise (could be played off in a day).

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s